|
A title dispute involving a territorial controversy between the states of Pennsylvania and
Connecticut.
In this case, Judge William Paterson spent much time explaining and reminding the jury the
relationship among the social compact, constitutions and legislatures; and particularly the relationship
of natural rights, property ownership, and contracts. An exceptional insight into the times and mindset
of the early nation.
Judge Paterson acknowledged that one of the primary purposes of the social compact was to protect
property. That the phrase “social compact” was used instead of the phrase “political trust” is
surprising. Nonetheless, the point stands that one of the primary purposes of government is to protect
life, liberty, and property.
Full text: Van Horne’s Lessee v.
Dorrance, 2 U.S. (Dallas) 304 (1795) |